Ask Your Question
0

Alredy move all to "usr", why not rework some other things?

asked 2012-03-03 02:30:57 -0500

this post is marked as community wiki

This post is a wiki. Anyone with karma >750 is welcome to improve it.

Well i've being using linux for a while now, not an expert more of a casual user, the one linux is always trying to impress or attract. So i'm very glad that finally the mess inside / (one so far i can barely start to understand)is being organize to make it more understandable to commoners.

So, now that's almost done, why not change names and use of some of those directories. For example, it is redundant to have all the same directories inside /usr and /usr/local, reason, i don't know. Why not move all those hidden files in /home to /usr/local/(name of the user) or to the same .local directory inside home.

I mean create a clean/neat directory tree more intuitive and simple.

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

1 Answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
0

answered 2012-03-03 07:52:54 -0500

FranciscoD_ gravatar image

Hello,

The hidden files in /home/$user are application specific. There is already a defined standard that the new applications are following. If there's an application you use that isn't, please file a bug at their bug tracker requesting them to make the change.

edit flag offensive delete link more

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Question Tools

Stats

Asked: 2012-03-03 02:30:57 -0500

Seen: 207 times

Last updated: Mar 03 '12