Ask Your Question
2

kvm network bridging and Samba shares issues

asked 2018-09-24 03:42:26 -0600

oddballln gravatar image

updated 2018-10-09 19:31:22 -0600

I have a Fedora host of the current version (fedora28) and Win7 guest with samba shares that are used by both (usually). shortly after the most recent update, either the guest would be seen in the router table (both guest and host hostnames listed) and not see the shares or not listed by hostname in router (only host hostname) and could see the shares. i have changed adapters, tried the clone of the kvm (very old clone), uninstalled and reinstall the kvm, reverted back to the previous update. At this point it will not see both the shares and be listed on the router (both host and guest at the same time) hope this makes sense because this problem sure doesnt. Yes this has taught me one thing BACKUP BEFORE UPDATES!! and that brings up another question of the best backup method. Thank you Additional:

ifconfig
br1: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        ether 66:9b:bf:02:f3:ad  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

eno1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        inet 192.168.1.43  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.1.255
        inet6 fe80::8d84:9f43:155b:da45  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>
        ether f8:b1:56:9f:11:f3  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 42950  bytes 4044743 (3.8 MiB)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 122681  bytes 67052875 (63.9 MiB)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
        device interrupt 20  memory 0xfbf00000-fbf20000  

lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING>  mtu 65536
        inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
        inet6 ::1  prefixlen 128  scopeid 0x10<host>
        loop  txqueuelen 1000  (Local Loopback)
        RX packets 57282  bytes 108210059 (103.1 MiB)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 57282  bytes 108210059 (103.1 MiB)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

virbr0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        inet 192.168.122.1  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.122.255
        ether 52:54:00:67:fc:26  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

vnet0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
        ether 22:d8:75:cf:3f:8e  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
        RX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
        TX packets 0  bytes 0 (0.0 B)
        TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
Br1 is the bridge but cannot get it to bind to eno1

Thank you

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

Comments

check your dnf history see if the update updated selinux rules you may need to re label, the samba share.

aeperezt gravatar imageaeperezt ( 2018-10-09 22:04:26 -0600 )edit

1 Answer

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
0

answered 2018-10-10 14:28:16 -0600

oddballln gravatar image

Thank you for that suggestion! here is the dnf history

dnf history

ID | Command line | Date and time | Action(s) | Altered

17 | upgrade --refresh        | 2018-09-11 03:39 | Update         |   51  <
16 | -y install tigervnc-serv | 2018-09-04 22:41 | Install        |    3 > 
15 | upgrade --refresh        | 2018-08-08 19:44 | E, I, O, U     |  420 **

the Shares were working fine on the update of ID 15 08-08 but broke on the tigervnc install. the tigervnc install was reversed but system didnt return to working order.... (I KNOW BACKUP BEFORE INSTALL!)

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

You need check on the 17 and list the update to check your selinux was updated

aeperezt gravatar imageaeperezt ( 2018-10-11 22:01:01 -0600 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2018-09-24 03:42:26 -0600

Seen: 50 times

Last updated: Oct 10