Ask Your Question
0

Boost 1.61 on Fedora24

asked 2016-10-18 20:15:57 -0600

Is there any chance that Fedora 24 will see an update to Boost 1.61? That release fixes some critical issues with the use of futures with boost::asio.

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

Comments

Thanks! I will do so.

Uncle Vlad gravatar imageUncle Vlad ( 2016-10-19 06:59:23 -0600 )edit

3 Answers

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
4

answered 2016-10-18 23:15:14 -0600

aeperezt gravatar image

You have more opportunity if you request it or file a bug on boost here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ that way package maintainer may act on it.

edit flag offensive delete link more
0

answered 2016-10-20 16:13:37 -0600

jwakely gravatar image

updated 2016-10-20 16:14:57 -0600

There is absolutely no chance of updating Boost for a stable Fedora release. None.

There is no binary compatibility guaranteed between Boost releases (and sometimes they aren't even source compatible) so updating from 1.60 to 1.61 would require rebuilding hundreds of packages in Fedora all at once, and getting everybody to update everything at once on a "flag day". It would be difficult, disruptive, and pointless

I'm going to update Boost in Rawhide soon though.

If there are critical bugs in Boost 1.60 that are fixed upstream then it might be possible to backport the fixes to the 1.60 release in Fedora. Please use Bugzilla for such things, providing code to reproduce the problem and links to upstream bugs and/or patches if possible. Thanks.

edit flag offensive delete link more
0

answered 2016-10-19 03:26:45 -0600

jake gravatar image

You can simply download the current Boost libs. Most Boost libs are header-only, so there is no need to build anything, just link em in your development environment.

Further readings: Boost - Getting Started on Unix Variants

edit flag offensive delete link more

Comments

Sadly, boost::asio is not header only, and we have a requirement to use the version "officially supported by the release" on Linux platforms. Windows is easy, as we use the most current release, which is why we are having this problem.

Uncle Vlad gravatar imageUncle Vlad ( 2016-10-19 06:58:18 -0600 )edit

Oh, i'm afraid this "officially supported by the release" constrain forces you to wait until the package maintainer makes his move.

jake gravatar imagejake ( 2016-10-19 08:31:46 -0600 )edit

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Question Tools

Stats

Asked: 2016-10-18 20:15:57 -0600

Seen: 175 times

Last updated: Oct 20 '16