Ask Your Question

Revision history [back]

Why is flatpak required (F29) ?

================================================================================
 Package                       Arch   Version            Repository        Size
================================================================================
Removing:
 flatpak                       x86_64 1.0.4-1.fc29       @updates-testing 4.0 M
Removing dependent packages:
 gdm                           x86_64 1:3.30.1-2.fc29    @updates-testing 2.3 M
 gnome-session-wayland-session x86_64 3.30.1-2.fc29      @updates-testing 7.4 k
 gnome-session-xsession        x86_64 3.30.1-2.fc29      @updates-testing  15 k
 gnome-shell                   x86_64 3.30.1-1.fc29      @updates-testing 7.4 M
 xdg-desktop-portal            x86_64 1.0.3-1.fc29       @updates-testing 1.5 M
 xdg-desktop-portal-gtk        x86_64 1.0.2-1.fc29       @updates-testing 725 k
Removing unused dependencies:
 gnome-keyring-pam             x86_64 3.28.2-2.fc29      @fedora           50 k
 gnome-session                 x86_64 3.30.1-2.fc29      @updates-testing 1.5 M
 libappstream-glib             x86_64 0.7.12-1.fc29      @fedora          1.0 M
 libstemmer                    x86_64 0-11.585svn.fc29   @fedora          355 k
 mutter                        x86_64 3.30.1-2.fc29      @updates-testing  12 M
 ostree-libs                   x86_64 2018.8-1.fc29      @updates-testing 939 k
 xorg-x11-server-Xwayland      x86_64 1.20.1-4.fc29      @updates-testing 2.4 M

Transaction Summary
================================================================================
Remove  14 Packages

Freed space: 34 M
Is this ok [y/N]: n
Operation aborted.

I have zero interest in flatpaks and would prefer them not on my systems. I'm fully aware that just because flatpak is installed, I don't have to install any flatpak packages.
Is this an error on F29 Beta that will be fixed, or is the future of Fedora going to be forcing Flatpak(s) on users?